|
1
|
- MTRI:
- Dr. Robert Shuchman
- Colin Brooks
- Eric Keefauver
- Ben Koziol
- Dr. Tyler Erickson
|
|
2
|
- Partnership between MTRI (formerly part of Altarum/ERIM) and the Western
Michigan University (WMU) Environmental Institute; funded by EPA
- Address the legacy of contamination on the Great Lakes and their
watersheds
- Help local & state stakeholders understand this legacy
- Develop watershed-scale methods to assess and protect human and
ecosystem health
- Used the Kalamazoo River watershed as a example site
- Expanded to Lower Fox River, WI (Green Bay)
- Modeled PCBs and water quality
- Added mercury and gene expression tools
- http://www.greatlakesdecisionsupport.org
- Science
- GIS
- Modeling
- Outreach
- Great Lakes information
|
|
3
|
- You live in Allegan, Michigan, near the Kalamazoo River
- Member of a local watershed group trying to understand risks
- A community leader helping local citizens understand impacts of the
legacy of pollution
- Another audience: Person working on fish consumption guidelines
- Where are the risky areas? What
are the risks?
- Used MDEQ reports for assessing risk:
- Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment (263 pages)
- Human Health Risk Assessment (169 pages)
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Display areas where PCB contamination has cause gene or protein damage
in carp
- Label with levels of gene/protein expression
- Allow users to query data, find out more about variables
- Help page on GLEAMS portal discussion research
- Gene & protein expression – another way of expressing risk
- Working closely with Chuck Ide
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Calculate National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (WQI)
- User-friendly explanation of WQI available at http://www.nsf.org/consumer/just_for_kids/wqi.asp
|
|
16
|
- Water Quality Index calculated at sample points along the river using
ALWAS data as the input
|
|
17
|
- Different WQI decision support scenarios can be modeled with GLEAMS WQI
tool
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Goal: Develop a tool to help
users understand if local fish consumption is likely to lead to mercury
exposure above EPA reference doses, esp. for women of 18-45, using
spatial sediment data as starting point
- Used documented Wisconsin DNR Lower Fox River database
- Capture complexity of modeling health risk from mercury in a valid &
user-friendly on-line mapping interface
- Enable user interaction, selection of scenarios: help community members to understand
level & locations of risks
|
|
20
|
- Most common aquatic mercury chemical species:
- Elemental, inert (Hg0)
- Divalent, reactive (Hg2+)
- Organic (MeHg)
- The first two, non-biologically available forms (elemental and divalent)
are the most common often accounting for greater than 90% of total
environmental mercury.
- Opposite is true for biological uptake:
> 90% of tissue-bound mercury is MeHg
- Mercury methylation typically occurs in the inactive, anoxic sediment
layer of lakes and streams regulated by sulfide concentration,
sulfate-reducing bacteria, pH, DOC/TOC, and temperature.
- Mercury speciation model incorporates hydrodynamics as well as chemical
kinetics to track speciation
- Challenge is the static methylation, demethylation, oxidation, and
reduction rates which are variable and influenced by the properties
listed above
- Another challenge is models do not currently enable mercury to move
between ‘finite elements’.
Hence, it is important to note that the speciation model is
derived from a ‘finite element model’
- Bioaccumulation – modeled using a generalized hydrophobic
bioaccumulation model.
- Wide species applicability and simplified calibration procedure
- Challenging to incorporate the effects of weight and age, highly
sensitive to changes in bioconcentration factor
- Human Health
- Two methods to assess health risks.
Both originate from EPA recommendations:
- RfD (reference dose) ŕ
acceptable blood mercury level that can be physiologically maintained
resulting in no noticeable health effects ŕ 0.0001 mg MeHg/kg body weight-day (female and children),
0.0003 (male)
- TRC (tissue residue criterion) ŕ fish tissue concentration that when consumed will not
result in a RfD above the recommended value
- A simple calculation involving body weight, dietary intake, and fish
tissue concentration
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- GLEAMS Portal: www.greatlakesdecisionsupport.org
- WMU Environmental Institute: www.wmich.edu/env/
- MTRI: www.mtri.org
|